• News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
Threads
Submit Your Content
Star Wars star explains why OG Trilogy never killed off main characters

Home> News> TV and Film

Published 10:00 28 Jun 2025 GMT+1

Star Wars star explains why OG Trilogy never killed off main characters

It makes a lot of sense

Kate Harrold

Kate Harrold

Star Wars’ original trilogy strayed away from killing off mainline characters; the same cannot be said for its successors.

The prequel trilogy notably dispatched of Qui-Gon Jinn and Mace Windu, while the sequel trilogy controversially killed off legacy characters Han Solo and Luke Skywalker.

We could debate all day long whether the latter was a good decision or not.

Do legacy characters deserve happy endings? Or is that protecting them with plot armour? Do major deaths remind viewers what’s at stake, raising the tension?

Advert

Personally, I’m not sure there’s a right answer. It’s something you need to determine on a case by case basis.

This being said, we do now have some idea as to why Han, Luke, and Leia were protected during that original trilogy run, as George Lucas had a reason as to why he opted not to kill any of his main characters.

He believed that Star Wars was for children.

As reported by SlashFilm, Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker) recently spoke to Today where he recounted the following tale: “When I would complain about things — in the third one, I said, 'Luke has lost his hand, he's got the black glove, shouldn't it be about Luke struggling with turning to the dark side?' George said, 'Mark, it's for children.' And that's why he would never consider killing any of the main characters. In the new ones, they pop us off one at a time."

Advert

This fits with Star Wars’ history.

You see, while the original trilogy may have appealed to young viewers, those viewers grew up.

By the time the prequel trilogy arrived, those existing fans, now adults, likely shared the cinema-going experience with their kids.

It’s why Star Wars is now seen as a family franchise, one that needs to retain appeal with both adults and kids.

Advert

That could be why subsequent trilogies have been a bit bolder in their choices to kill off certain characters.

The pure existence of Andor signals that Lucasfulm is aware it needs to retain the attention of its older fans.

While I don’t think the sequel trilogy was, on the whole, well handled, I do actually think Star Wars needs to retain high stakes and major deaths are a part of that.

A story needs a sense of risk, but that shouldn't mean Luke Skywalker has to poof away in a silly cloud of dust.

Featured Image Credit: 20th Century Fox

Topics: Star Wars, Lucasfilm, Disney, TV And Film

Advert

Advert

Advert

  • Star Wars fans surprised by brand-new trilogy
  • Star Wars fans divided over original plans for Sequel Trilogy
  • Star Wars fans praise recast so good they ‘forgot’ OG actor
  • Star Wars’ ‘strongest’ character has fans seriously torn

Choose your content:

6 hours ago
8 hours ago
11 hours ago
12 hours ago
  • 6 hours ago

    Steam drops free download for open-world game you'll lose hours to

    Grab your board and take to the peaks

    News
  • 8 hours ago

    Fallout: New Hampshire is a big hit with fans

    I've always fancied a visit, I must say

    News
  • 11 hours ago

    Skyrim fans horrified by secret so dark Bethesda never wanted us to find it

    No wonder it's cut content

    News
  • 12 hours ago

    Cyberpunk 2077 gets fascinating new ‘expansion’ you can download now

    We put mods in your mods

    News