• News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • News

  • TV & Film

  • PlayStation

  • Xbox

  • Nintendo

  • PC

  • Reviews

  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Snapchat
TikTok
YouTube
Threads
Submit Your Content
Starfield called 'drastic step back' from Skyrim and Fallout by angry fans

Home> News> Platform> Xbox

Published 15:49 11 Sep 2023 GMT+1

Starfield called 'drastic step back' from Skyrim and Fallout by angry fans

One YouTuber has said that Starfield is a "drastic step back" when compared to Skyrim and Fallout.

Kate Harrold

Kate Harrold

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Bethesda

Topics: Starfield, Bethesda, PC, Xbox

Advert

Advert

Advert

Starfield continues to divide. I’m sure if your social media feed is anything like mine, opinions alternate between ‘this game is incredible’ and ‘this game is underwhelming’ with every successive tweet.

Personally, I’m a big fan of the game. In our 10 star review, I wrote, “Every now and then, a new game comes along that changes our perception of what the industry is capable of. Starfield is that game. This is beyond what we’ve come to know an open-world to be. Bethesda has created a universe that, despite its vast scale, maintains interest and an impressive attention to detail throughout.” Other players have taken issue with the game’s immersion though, particularly when it comes to fast travel and loading screens. Some are even now referring to Starfield as being a “drastic step back” from Skyrim and Fallout.

Take a look at our video review of Starfield review.

Advert

The dichotomy continues because while some players berate the game, it’s also been announced to be Bethesda’s biggest launch of all-time. As reported by Dexerto, YouTuber NakeyJakey recently shared his thoughts on Starfield’s “utterly dreadful” exploration. On Twitter, he wrote, “Twenty five hours in and exploration in Starfield is utterly dreadful. You land on a planet, it generates a bunch of locations (most of them like 400 metres away, if not more) and you WALK.”

He continued, “There is no ship to fly, there is no rover to drive. There’s not even a space horse to mount to keep traversal engaging. You mindlessly sprint and boost jump [through] a soulless field of nothing to reach a copy and pasted destination that very rarely feels worth the effort. This is such a drastic step back from the amazing sense of exploration and wonder that Skyrim and Fallout 4 inspired, it truly baffles me.”

Hm. I’ll add that you can fast travel to points of interest on a planet if you don’t want to walk / jetpack. It’s also clear that NakeyJakey is talking about the game’s procedurally-generated planets, which somewhat doesn’t add into the picture that there are also 100 human-generated planets filled with complex, unique points of interest to explore. I don’t see the Starfield divide ending anytime soon.

Choose your content:

2 hours ago
8 hours ago
12 hours ago
15 hours ago
  • Don't Nod
    2 hours ago

    PlayStation Plus Users Given Last Chance To Play 'Incredible' Free Game

    A few weeks left to play.

    News
  • Veilbreak Studio
    8 hours ago

    New Steam Free Download Gives Resident Evil A Run For Its Money

    Looks pretty scary.

    News
  • PlayWay
    12 hours ago

    PC Gamers Have 24 Hours Left To Claim Free 9/10 Game

    Not long left.

    News
  • Valve / GAMINGbible
    15 hours ago

    Upcoming Steam Update Could Save You Money In The Long Term

    This is going to be much better for purchase decisions.

    News
  • Starfield fans furious over latest update from Xbox
  • Fallout: Chicago Just Landed And It'll Fill The Wait For Fallout 5
  • Starfield Drops Major Anniversary Teaser
  • Starfield Gamers Braced For Major Update